Manzambi vs Ødegaard

FPL, Gameweek 9 · FPL's own numbers, round by round · data as of 26 October 2026, rebuilt every night

  1. Expected points, next GW

    5.7
    2.3
  2. Form, last 30 days

    5.7
    2.3
  3. Points this season

    31
    36
  4. Minutes played

    319'
    646'
  5. Next 5 fixtures, avg difficulty

    2.8
    3.2
  6. Points per £m

    5.2
    5.3
  7. Expected goal involvements

    2.07
    4.18

On FPL's numbers before Gameweek 9, Martin Ødegaard wins 4 of 7 rounds against Johan Manzambi (3 to Manzambi): FPL projects 5.7 points for Manzambi and 2.3 for Ødegaard in Gameweek 9, and Manzambi has the easier next five (2.8 against 3.2) (26 October 2026).

Settle it in your mini-league

“Manzambi vs Ødegaard for Gameweek 9: Ødegaard wins 4-3 on FPL's own numbers. Round by round:”

The next five

ManzambiFULGW9MUNGW10SUNGW11IPSGW12EVEGW13
ØdegaardLIVGW9HULGW10NEWGW11MCIGW12BREGW13

The questions people ask

Manzambi or Ødegaard in FPL for Gameweek 9?
On FPL's numbers before Gameweek 9, Martin Ødegaard wins 4 of 7 rounds against Johan Manzambi (3 to Manzambi): FPL projects 5.7 points for Manzambi and 2.3 for Ødegaard in Gameweek 9, and Manzambi has the easier next five (2.8 against 3.2) (26 October 2026).
Who has the better fixtures, Manzambi or Ødegaard?
Over the next five gameweeks, Johan Manzambi's fixtures average 2.8 difficulty and Martin Ødegaard's 3.2, on FPL's own 1 to 5 scale (26 October 2026).
How is this comparison scored?
Round by round on Fantasy Premier League's own numbers: expected points for the next gameweek, form, season points, minutes, fixture difficulty, points per million and one stat for the position. FPLBubbles does not run its own points model; the scoreboard counts rounds, it does not tell you who to buy.
Manzambi's pageØdegaard's pageCompare them on the map

More comparisons

Data from the public FPL API, rebuilt every night. FPLBubbles is an independent tool and is not affiliated with the Premier League or Fantasy Premier League.