Ødegaard vs Neto

FPL, Gameweek 9 · FPL's own numbers, round by round · data as of 27 October 2026, rebuilt every night

  1. Expected points, next GW

    2.3
    7.7
  2. Form, last 30 days

    2.3
    7.7
  3. Points this season

    36
    37
  4. Minutes played

    646'
    591'
  5. Next 5 fixtures, avg difficulty

    3.2
    3.0
  6. Points per £m

    5.4
    5.6
  7. Expected goal involvements

    4.18
    2.30

On FPL's numbers before Gameweek 9, Pedro Lomba Neto wins 5 of 7 rounds against Martin Ødegaard (2 to Ødegaard): FPL projects 2.3 points for Ødegaard and 7.7 for Neto in Gameweek 9, and Neto has the easier next five (3.0 against 3.2) (27 October 2026).

Settle it in your mini-league

“Ødegaard vs Neto for Gameweek 9: Neto wins 5-2 on FPL's own numbers. Round by round:”

The next five

ØdegaardLIVGW9HULGW10NEWGW11MCIGW12BREGW13
NetoMUNGW9SUNGW10LEEGW11NFOGW12CRYGW13

The questions people ask

Ødegaard or Neto in FPL for Gameweek 9?
On FPL's numbers before Gameweek 9, Pedro Lomba Neto wins 5 of 7 rounds against Martin Ødegaard (2 to Ødegaard): FPL projects 2.3 points for Ødegaard and 7.7 for Neto in Gameweek 9, and Neto has the easier next five (3.0 against 3.2) (27 October 2026).
Who has the better fixtures, Ødegaard or Neto?
Over the next five gameweeks, Martin Ødegaard's fixtures average 3.2 difficulty and Pedro Lomba Neto's 3.0, on FPL's own 1 to 5 scale (27 October 2026).
How is this comparison scored?
Round by round on Fantasy Premier League's own numbers: expected points for the next gameweek, form, season points, minutes, fixture difficulty, points per million and one stat for the position. FPLBubbles does not run its own points model; the scoreboard counts rounds, it does not tell you who to buy.
Ødegaard's pageNeto's pageCompare them on the map

More comparisons

Data from the public FPL API, rebuilt every night. FPLBubbles is an independent tool and is not affiliated with the Premier League or Fantasy Premier League.